What Happened to the Promised Bounty of GMO Crops?

GMO Crops

The Biggest Barrier to Organic Foods is the High Prices…

What if there was a Company that had the ability to lower the cost of organic food up to 66%?

What if there was a Company that had a business model to eliminate the proliferation of Genetically Modified (GMO) and Engineered (GE) foods contaminated with toxins?

Green PolkaDot Box is that Company…

Find Out More…

Original Article appears in New York Times | by Danny Hakim

GMOs were supposed to feed a growing world population and curb pesticides. But after 20 years, they have fallen short.

The controversy over genetically modified crops has long focused on largely unsubstantiated fears that they are unsafe to eat.

But an extensive examination by The New York Times indicates that the debate has missed a more basic problem — genetic modification in the United States and Canada has not accelerated increases in crop yields or led to an overall reduction in the use of chemical pesticides.

The promise of genetic modification was twofold: By making crops immune to the effects of weedkillers and inherently resistant to many pests, they would grow so robustly that they would become indispensable to feeding the world’s growing population, while also requiring fewer applications of sprayed pesticides.

Twenty years ago, Europe largely rejected genetic modification at the same time the United States and Canada were embracing it. Comparing results on the two continents, using independent data as well as academic and industry research, shows how the technology has fallen short of…

See the entire article.

0 Comments

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*